About Non GamStop

We started this project because we kept noticing the same gap: players who had self-excluded through GamStop were returning to search engines with perfectly reasonable questions and finding either thin affiliate lists or dense legal essays. Neither actually helped them make a confident decision. We wanted to do something more useful.

Our team is made up of people who have spent years inside the casino publishing world — writers, researchers, and a couple of former customer-support professionals who understand what players genuinely struggle to figure out on their own. That background shapes everything we publish. We are not here to push volume; we are here to make each page earn its place.

What We Actually Do

At its core, our work is evaluation. When a casino site appears on our ranked list, it has been looked at across a consistent set of criteria: how the licensing authority handles disputes, how quickly withdrawals clear in practice, whether bonus conditions are written in plain language, and how the support team responds when something goes wrong. We do not accept a site at face value because it has a flashy welcome offer or a recognisable software provider.

We also revisit sites after they are listed. Conditions change — wagering requirements shift, payment processors come and go, and support quality can drift. Our ranked grid reflects where things stand now, not where they stood when we first reviewed a site.

How We Stay Independent

Some of our pages carry affiliate links, which means we may receive a commission if a reader signs up through one of them. We think transparency about that is non-negotiable. Affiliate income does not determine ranking position — a site with a generous commission structure that fails our evaluation criteria does not make the list. A site with a modest commission that passes does. That is the only way a ranked list stays trustworthy over time.

Who This Site Is For

We write for adults who have made a considered choice to look beyond self-exclusion schemes and want clear, factual information to guide that choice. We do not sensationalise the category or pretend the trade-offs do not exist. Our job is to lay out what we know accurately so readers can decide for themselves.

If you have a question about our methodology, spotted something that looks out of date, or want to flag a concern about a listed site, please contact us — we read every message and treat corrections as seriously as we treat our original research.